A crise constitucional acerca do Instituto da presunção de inocência
Carregando...
Arquivos
Tipo
TCC
Data de publicação
2020-12
Periódico
Citações (Scopus)
Autores
Esperandio, Leonardo
Orientador
Lorencini, Bruno César
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Membros da banca
Programa
Resumo
A Presunção de Inocência é um instituto de extrema importância no âmbito penal
atualmente. A qualidade de inocente garante um processo justo e adequado para o
imputado durante a persecução penal, bem como seu julgamento. Referida matéria tem
confrontado doutrinadores e especialistas em longevos anos, causando consequências
como extensos debates e instabilidade no atual ordenamento jurídico brasileiro.
O Supremo Tribunal Federal, com o fito de restabelecer a segurança jurídica, trava uma
batalha árdua e difícil desde 2009 ao tentar definir o início de cumprimento da pena do
indiciado. É axiomático a necessidade de realizar um estudo minucioso do assunto
supracitado. A Constituição Federal de 1988 expõe de maneira clara acerca do trânsito em
julgado, início de cumprimento de pena e a presunção de inocência. Entretanto, o
Supremo Tribunal Federal precisou intervir e decidir. O Ativismo Judicial foi de grande
importância para combater a contradição a ser estudada e explicada. A fixação do início
de cumprimento de pena traz reflexos em diversas áreas do direito contemporâneo.
The Presumption of Innocence is currently an extremely principle in the criminal sphere. The quality of innocent guarantees a due and adequate process for the accused throughout the criminal prosecution, as well as in trial. This matter has confronted jurists and specialists for many years, causing consequences such as extensive debates and instability in the current Brazilian legal system. The Federal Supreme Court, in order to restore legal certainty, has been fighting an arduous and challenging battle since 2009 in attempt to define when the defendant’s sentence shall commence. It is axiomatic that it is necessary to conduct a thorough study of the aforementioned subject. The Federal Constitution of 1988 clearly states about the res judicata, the commencement of the sentence and the presumption of innocence. However, the Federal Supreme Court had to intervene and decide. The Judicial Activism was of great importance in combating the contradiction to be studied and clarified. The setting of the commencement of serving sentences brings reflexes in several areas of contemporary law.
The Presumption of Innocence is currently an extremely principle in the criminal sphere. The quality of innocent guarantees a due and adequate process for the accused throughout the criminal prosecution, as well as in trial. This matter has confronted jurists and specialists for many years, causing consequences such as extensive debates and instability in the current Brazilian legal system. The Federal Supreme Court, in order to restore legal certainty, has been fighting an arduous and challenging battle since 2009 in attempt to define when the defendant’s sentence shall commence. It is axiomatic that it is necessary to conduct a thorough study of the aforementioned subject. The Federal Constitution of 1988 clearly states about the res judicata, the commencement of the sentence and the presumption of innocence. However, the Federal Supreme Court had to intervene and decide. The Judicial Activism was of great importance in combating the contradiction to be studied and clarified. The setting of the commencement of serving sentences brings reflexes in several areas of contemporary law.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
presunção de inocência , código de processo penal , segurança jurídica , Supremo Tribunal Federal , presumption of innocence , code of criminal procedure , legal security , Federal Supreme Court