A lei anticorrupção: uma análise do compliance à luz da controvérsia entre Kelsen e Ehrlich
Carregando...
Tipo
TCC
Data de publicação
2023-12
Periódico
Citações (Scopus)
Autores
Benedetti , Samantha Gabrielli
Orientador
Lima, Fernando Rister de Sousa
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Membros da banca
Programa
Resumo
O artigo 37, caput, da Constituição Federal estabelece que a Administração Pública direta e indireta está sujeita, dentre outros princípios, ao da moralidade. Porém, esse princípio, em especial, é enfraquecido quando a corrupção torna a Administração Pública refém de interesses privados e minoritários. Este fato fomentou a necessidade de uma Lei específica, capaz de não apenas reconhecer a existência da corrupção no âmbito corporativo, como também de mitigar seus efeitos. Assim, a Lei Anticorrupção surge como um mecanismo jurídico de atuação no Direito Público e Privado, apresentando, ainda, uma tendência de materialização da ética e da transparência – os programas de compliance. Nesse sentido, a pesquisa, que tem como escopo identificar se esse fenômeno, em particular, está inserido em um modelo de tipos de ideais fechados, resultante da interpretação teórica de Hans Kelsen ou se está inserido em um modelo aberto às relações sociais e, portanto, resultado da interpretação do Direito Vivo de Eugen Ehrlich realizou-se mediante investigação teórica, conduzida pelo processo indutivo. Centrou-se a coleta de dados em teóricos, especialmente a partir do exame hermenêutico da controvérsia existente entre os dois pensadores, ao passo que o estudo foi enviesado por uma perspectiva analítica dos programas de compliance e sua interface com a Lei Anticorrupção. Com efeito, o resultado configurou-se na construção e análise do compliance vivo, uma vez que a moral e a ética são elementos essenciais para a conceituação do fenômeno e sua consequente efetividade.
Article 37, caput, of the Federal Constitution establishes that the direct and indirect Public Administration is subject, among other principles, to morality. However, this principle, in particular, is weakened when corruption makes the Public Administration hostage to private and minority interests. This fact fostered the need for a specific Law, capable not only of recognizing the existence of corruption in the corporate sphere, but also of mitigating its effects. Thus, the Anti-Corruption Law emerges as a legal mechanism for acting in Public and Private Law, also presenting a tendency to materialize ethics and transparency – compliance programs. In this sense, the research, which aims to identify if this phenomenon, in particular, is inserted in a model of types of closed ideals, resulting from the theoretical interpretation of Hans Kelsen or if it is inserted in a model open to social relations and, therefore, the result of the interpretation of Living Law by Eugen Ehrlich was carried out through theoretical investigation, driven by the inductive process. Data collection was focused on theorists, especially from the hermeneutic examination of the controversy between the two thinkers, while the study was biased by an analytical perspective of compliance programs and their interface with the Anti-Corruption Law. In fact, the result was configured in the construction and analysis of living compliance, since morality and ethics are essential elements for the conceptualization of the phenomenon and its consequent effectiveness.
Article 37, caput, of the Federal Constitution establishes that the direct and indirect Public Administration is subject, among other principles, to morality. However, this principle, in particular, is weakened when corruption makes the Public Administration hostage to private and minority interests. This fact fostered the need for a specific Law, capable not only of recognizing the existence of corruption in the corporate sphere, but also of mitigating its effects. Thus, the Anti-Corruption Law emerges as a legal mechanism for acting in Public and Private Law, also presenting a tendency to materialize ethics and transparency – compliance programs. In this sense, the research, which aims to identify if this phenomenon, in particular, is inserted in a model of types of closed ideals, resulting from the theoretical interpretation of Hans Kelsen or if it is inserted in a model open to social relations and, therefore, the result of the interpretation of Living Law by Eugen Ehrlich was carried out through theoretical investigation, driven by the inductive process. Data collection was focused on theorists, especially from the hermeneutic examination of the controversy between the two thinkers, while the study was biased by an analytical perspective of compliance programs and their interface with the Anti-Corruption Law. In fact, the result was configured in the construction and analysis of living compliance, since morality and ethics are essential elements for the conceptualization of the phenomenon and its consequent effectiveness.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
lei anticorrupção , programas de compliance , controvérsia Kelsen e Ehrlich , anti-corruption law , compliance programs , Kelsen and Ehrlich controversy