Análise jurisprudencial das decisões do TJSP em relação às fake news durante a pandemia do coronavírus.
Carregando...
Tipo
TCC
Data de publicação
2022-12
Periódico
Citações (Scopus)
Autores
Silva, Henrique Carvalho
Orientador
Marinho, Maria Edelvacy Pinto
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Membros da banca
Programa
Resumo
Diante da intensa propagação de fake news durante a pandemia da
Covid-19, que se iniciou oficialmente no dia 11 de março de 2020, este trabalho
buscou entender como as redes sociais, Facebook, Youtube e Twitter lidaram com o
tema. Dessa forma, foi realizada uma análise dos termos de uso relacionados ao
coronavírus e a desinformação, bem como a quantidade de remoções aplicadas
pelas plataformas. Para completar o estudo, foram lidos 20 (vinte) acórdãos
retirados do Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo, todos eles relacionados ao tema do
compartilhamento de desinformações dentro das plataformas, em que os
magistrados decidiram a respeito da legalidade das remoções de conteúdo. A partir
disso, o objetivo deste artigo é entender se a jurisprudência do TJSP concorda com
os termos de uso dos provedores e as remoções aplicadas, analisando os principais
argumentos dos juízes.
Faced with the intense spread of fake news during the Covid-19 pandemic, which officially started on March 11, 2020, this work sought to understand how social networks such as Facebook, Youtube and Twitter dealt with the issue. In this way, an analysis of the terms of use related to coronavirus and disinformation was carried out, as well as the number of removals applied by the platforms. In order to complete the study, 20 (twenty) judgments taken from the São Paulo Court of Justice (TJSP) were read, all of them related to the issue of sharing misinformation within the platforms, in which the magistrates decided on the legality of content removals. From this, the objective of this article is to understand whether the TJSP jurisprudence agrees with the terms of use of the providers and the removals applied, analyzing the judge's main arguments.
Faced with the intense spread of fake news during the Covid-19 pandemic, which officially started on March 11, 2020, this work sought to understand how social networks such as Facebook, Youtube and Twitter dealt with the issue. In this way, an analysis of the terms of use related to coronavirus and disinformation was carried out, as well as the number of removals applied by the platforms. In order to complete the study, 20 (twenty) judgments taken from the São Paulo Court of Justice (TJSP) were read, all of them related to the issue of sharing misinformation within the platforms, in which the magistrates decided on the legality of content removals. From this, the objective of this article is to understand whether the TJSP jurisprudence agrees with the terms of use of the providers and the removals applied, analyzing the judge's main arguments.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Covid-19 , desinformação , TJSP , fake news , disinformation