A boa-fé do terceiro adquirente e o princípio da concentração dos atos na matrícula do imóvel
Carregando...
Tipo
TCC
Data de publicação
2023-06
Periódico
Citações (Scopus)
Autores
Paniguel, Ana Paula Leme
Orientador
Fernandes, Luis Eduardo Simardi
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Membros da banca
Programa
Resumo
Este trabalho tem por escopo elucidar a boa-fé do terceiro adquirente na hipótese de não constar gravames judiciais na matrícula do bem adquirido, com amparo no princípio da concentração dos atos na matrícula do imóvel. Trata-se de tema relevante e de importante estudo, considerando a recente edição da Medida Provisória de nº 1.085, que posteriormente foi convertida na Lei nº 14.382/2022 e recepcionada pela Lei nº 13.097/15. Previamente à edição da referida norma regulamentadora, o entendimento jurisprudencial condicionava o reconhecimento da boa-fé do terceiro adquirente à emissão das certidões dos distribuidores judiciais relativo à comarca do bem imóvel e do domicílio do alienante, além das certidões fiscais e de propriedade e de ônus reais. Em grande parte dos casos, o comprador que deixa de obter as referidas certidões e é demandado judicialmente tem a sua má-fé reconhecida, com fundamento na falta de cautela e diligência mínima antes da celebração do negócio, possibilitando eventual reconhecimento de fraude contra credores ou de fraude à execução. Desse modo, o presente trabalho buscará demonstrar que, em razão da recente regulamentação quanto à desnecessidade de obtenção da certidão de distribuidores judiciais em nome do comprador, seja na comarca do bem ou no domicílio de seu alienante, os tribunais pátrios deverão observar referido comando legal e promover a pacificação do entendimento, garantindo-se a preservação do direito real do terceiro adquirente e em respeito ao princípio da concentração dos atos na matrícula do imóvel.
The purpose of this work is to elucidate the good faith of the third-party purchaser in case there are no judicial liens in the registration of the acquired property, according to the principle of concentration of acts in the registration of the property. This is a relevant theme and an important study, considering the recent enactment of Provisional Measure 1085, which was later converted into Law 14.382/2022 and received by Law 13.097/15. Prior to the edition of the regulatory rule, the jurisprudential understanding conditioned the recognition of the good faith of the third-party purchaser to the issuance of certificates from the judicial distributors related to the district of the real estate property and of the seller's domicile, in addition to tax certificates and certificates of ownership and of real onus. In most of the cases, the buyer who fails to obtain such certificates and is sued in court has his bad faith recognized, based on the lack of caution and minimum diligence before entering the transaction, enabling eventual recognition of fraud against creditors or fraud to the execution. Therefore, the present work will attempt to demonstrate that, due to the recent regulation as to the lack of need to obtain a certificate from the court distributors in the name of the buyer, whether in the region where the property is located or in the seller's domicile, the Brazilian courts should observe this legal command and promote the pacification of the understanding, guaranteeing the preservation of the real right of the third party buyer and in respect to the principle of concentration of the acts in the real estate registry.
The purpose of this work is to elucidate the good faith of the third-party purchaser in case there are no judicial liens in the registration of the acquired property, according to the principle of concentration of acts in the registration of the property. This is a relevant theme and an important study, considering the recent enactment of Provisional Measure 1085, which was later converted into Law 14.382/2022 and received by Law 13.097/15. Prior to the edition of the regulatory rule, the jurisprudential understanding conditioned the recognition of the good faith of the third-party purchaser to the issuance of certificates from the judicial distributors related to the district of the real estate property and of the seller's domicile, in addition to tax certificates and certificates of ownership and of real onus. In most of the cases, the buyer who fails to obtain such certificates and is sued in court has his bad faith recognized, based on the lack of caution and minimum diligence before entering the transaction, enabling eventual recognition of fraud against creditors or fraud to the execution. Therefore, the present work will attempt to demonstrate that, due to the recent regulation as to the lack of need to obtain a certificate from the court distributors in the name of the buyer, whether in the region where the property is located or in the seller's domicile, the Brazilian courts should observe this legal command and promote the pacification of the understanding, guaranteeing the preservation of the real right of the third party buyer and in respect to the principle of concentration of the acts in the real estate registry.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
boa-fé , terceiro adquirente , princípio da concentração dos atos , insegurança jurídica , good faith , third party buyer , principle of concentration , legal insecurity