A repercussão geral no Supremo Tribunal Federal

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.advisorTavares, André Ramospt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5047178759815100por
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Damares Medinapt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1721292294070477por
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-15T19:35:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-28T17:57:03Z
dc.date.available2014-12-10pt_BR
dc.date.available2020-05-28T17:57:03Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-04pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses Brazilian Supreme Federal Court s ( Supremo Tribunal Federal , STF) decision behavior, under the specific perspective of the general repercussion of the constitutional question. The starting point was the academic debate and several empiric studies regarding the judicial decision making process in the supreme courts. The Brazilian experience was analyzed using a comprehensive empiric research that comprised the examination of the whole universe of general repercussion s topics judged by STF until December 31st 2013. We have investigated how STF has been applying the institute of general repercussion in order to understand general repercussion effects on the access to constitutional jurisdiction. The outcome evidenced the rapporteur power over the definition of general repercussion s result, as well as his selectivity of the case, of the process to be judged and of the judging house. We have identified that the institutional context influences the trial s output, once the virtual plenary is the main competent house for judging general repercussion on STF. The analysis showed that, despite virtual plenary success and its adjustment to general repercussion trial, there are limitations to be faced for its improvement and a possible amplification of its competences. Finally, we concluded that the incorporation of the general repercussion of the constitutional question to STF s decision process increased access to constitutional jurisdiction.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfpor
dc.identifier.citationCOELHO, Damares Medina. A repercussão geral no Supremo Tribunal Federal. 2014. 255 f. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo, 2014.por
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/23089
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Presbiteriana Mackenziepor
dc.rightsAcesso Embargadopor
dc.subjectrepercussão geralpor
dc.subjectSupremo Tribunal Federalpor
dc.subjectjurisdição constitucionalpor
dc.subjectprocesso de tomada de decisãopor
dc.subjectcomportamento decisóriopor
dc.subjectplenário virtualpor
dc.subjectseletividades do relatorpor
dc.subjectgeneral repercussioneng
dc.subjectSupreme Federal Courteng
dc.subjectconstitutional jurisdictioneng
dc.subjectdecision making processeng
dc.subjectdecision behavioreng
dc.subjectvirtual plenaryeng
dc.subjectrapporteur selectivityeng
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOpor
dc.thumbnail.urlhttp://tede.mackenzie.br/jspui/retrieve/3395/Damares%20Medina%20Coelho.pdf.jpg*
dc.titleA repercussão geral no Supremo Tribunal Federalpor
dc.typeTesepor
local.contributor.board1Siqueira Neto, José Franciscopt_BR
local.contributor.board1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0281418007501711por
local.contributor.board2Casseb, Paulo Adibpt_BR
local.contributor.board2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5311245748602873por
local.contributor.board3Clève, Clèmerson Merlinpt_BR
local.contributor.board3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3835364244120054por
local.publisher.countryBRpor
local.publisher.departmentDireitopor
local.publisher.initialsUPMpor
local.publisher.programDireito Político e Econômicopor
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Damares Medina Coelho.pdf
Tamanho:
2.61 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Baixar
Coleções
Direito Político e Econômico - Teses - Direito Higienópolis