A reserva de jurisdição

dc.contributor.advisorSmanio, Gianpaolo Poggiopt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9297681530922931por
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Guilherme Newton do Montept_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6735932504113560por
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-15T19:34:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-28T18:06:24Z
dc.date.available2010-03-15pt_BR
dc.date.available2020-05-28T18:06:24Z
dc.date.issued2009-11-30pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThe separation of powers, in its historic design, should be glimpsed in its multiple dimensions social, legal, political and organic-functional and if it´s certain that currently it´s not taken into account its social and political dimensions, it has, in the current stage of contemporary constitutional State, the exact meaning of conciliation, equilibrium and harmony between its political and organic-functional dimensions, once it seeks to assign to each established organ certain functions that allow, within a system of checks and balances, harmony, coordination, interdependence, cooperation, to reach a more complete political balance as possible and aiming, at the same time, as far as possible and without harming the pursued balance, to assign functions in accordance to the Constitution, the capability, training, composition, in short, the profile, the vocation and the specific ability of each body, which means that, despite the impossibility of an exclusive attribution, each organ must have a preponderant function. The reservation of jurisdiction, in turn, while available at the same time to organic arrangements and functional efficiency, at the moment that preserves, to the courts, the full exercise of the function that, based on adequacy and efficiency standards, it is constitutionally assigned, as well as the political balance, since focused only on a minimum essential nucleus of typically jurisdictional function, deviates and repudiates the absolute correlation between organ and function and the typical functional exclusivity of a rigid separation that, as seen, would invariably conduct to the supremacy of only one power and, therefore, to a political imbalance, does nothing more than reproduce the idea and the purposes contained in what we call organic-functional and political dimensions of the separation of powers, so we can say that it´s currently the most incisive and faithful expression of separation of powers, as it stands in contemporary constitutional State.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfpor
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/23981
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Presbiteriana Mackenziepor
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopor
dc.subjectteoria do estadopor
dc.subjectreserva de jurisdiçãopor
dc.subjectpoder judiciáriopor
dc.subjectseparação de poderespor
dc.subjectfunção jurisdicionapor
dc.subjectreservation of jurisdictioneng
dc.subjectthe judiciaryeng
dc.subjectseparation of powerseng
dc.subjectjurisdictional functioneng
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOpor
dc.thumbnail.urlhttp://tede.mackenzie.br/jspui/retrieve/3564/Guilherme%20Newton%20do%20Monte%20Pinto.pdf.jpg*
dc.titleA reserva de jurisdiçãopor
dc.typeDissertaçãopor
local.contributor.board1Tavares, André Ramospt_BR
local.contributor.board1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5047178759815100por
local.contributor.board2Beneti, Sidnei Agostinhopt_BR
local.publisher.countryBRpor
local.publisher.departmentDireitopor
local.publisher.initialsUPMpor
local.publisher.programDireito Político e Econômicopor
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Guilherme Newton do Monte Pinto.pdf
Tamanho:
1.17 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: