Perguntas retóricas no plenário do Supremo Tribunal Federal

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.advisorNeves, Maria Helena de Moura
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7763723797874715por
dc.contributor.authorBarutti, Glauco Pedrosa
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8909243311844439por
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-09T16:26:36Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-07T15:08:15Z
dc.date.available2020-12-07T15:08:15Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-13
dc.description.abstractRhetorical questions are among the distinct mechanisms that languages use to code a fine gradation between the assertive declarations and the genuine interrogative character of questions. Though it is not possible to assert the intentions of the speaker, in using rhetorical questions, he shows a persuasion strategy that consists of conducting the hearer towards an expected answer. For this peculiar character, rhetorical questions have been the object of study of some authors (PETTY et al, 1981; FRANK, 1990; HOWARD, 1990; HERRING, 1991; REXACH, 1998; SILVA; DOS SANTOS, 2015). In this work, we review and amplify the findings of these authors, through the identification of semantic-pragmatic elements that are part of the rhetorical questions found in judgements of the Supreme Court in Brazil. In this genre, rhetorical questions are a linguistic resource largely used, be it in the written votes or the debates of the ministers, one that offers a rich corpus for study. Aside from confirming previous findings, like the role of “negation”, “negative polarity items (NPIs) and positive polarity items (PPIs)” — that establish pragmatic scales — and the use of the “conditional” as semantic-pragmatic elements that point to the rhetorical character of some questions, we propose — and show — that “mutual knowledge” contributes to the persuasive strength, since the questions gain their rhetorical character in the mutually shared knowledge between speaker and hearer. We confirmed the hypothesis that, in the genre used for the study, “mutual knowledge” is the more abundant semantic-pragmatic element in the universe of the rhetorical questions.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpor
dc.formatapplication/pdf*
dc.identifier.citationBARUTTI, Glauco Pedrosa. Perguntas retóricas no plenário do Supremo Tribunal Federal. 2020. 84 f. Dissertação (Letras) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo, 2020.por
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/26560
dc.keywordsrhetoriceng
dc.keywordsrhetorical questionseng
dc.keywordsmutual knowledgeeng
dc.keywordspolarityeng
dc.keywordspragmatic scaleseng
dc.keywordsSTFeng
dc.keywordsjudgementeng
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Presbiteriana Mackenziepor
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectretóricapor
dc.subjectperguntas retóricaspor
dc.subjectconhecimento mútuopor
dc.subjectpolaridadepor
dc.subjectescalas pragmáticaspor
dc.subjectSTFpor
dc.subjectacórdãopor
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICApor
dc.titlePerguntas retóricas no plenário do Supremo Tribunal Federalpor
dc.typeDissertaçãopor
local.contributor.board1Hilgert, José Gastón
local.contributor.board2Coneglian, André Vinícius Lopes
local.publisher.countryBrasilpor
local.publisher.departmentCentro de Comunicação e Letras (CCL)por
local.publisher.initialsUPMpor
local.publisher.programLetraspor
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Glauco Pedrosa Barutti.pdf
Tamanho:
20.84 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Baixar
Coleções
Letras - Dissertações - CCL Higienópolis