Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation in decreasing depression symptoms during the peripartum period: A systematic review

dc.contributor.authorPacheco F.
dc.contributor.authorGuiomar R.
dc.contributor.authorBrunoni A.R.
dc.contributor.authorBuhagiar R.
dc.contributor.authorEvagorou O.
dc.contributor.authorRoca-Lecumberri A.
dc.contributor.authorPoleszczyk A.
dc.contributor.authorLambregtse-van den Berg M.
dc.contributor.authorCaparros-Gonzalez R.A.
dc.contributor.authorFonseca A.
dc.contributor.authorOsorio A.
dc.contributor.authorSoliman M.
dc.contributor.authorGanho-Avila A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T19:19:41Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T19:19:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstract© 2021 The Author(s)Background: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have been suggested as alternative treatments to decrease depression symptoms during the perinatal period. These include brain stimulation techniques that do not require surgery and that are nonpharmacological and non-psychotherapeutic. NIBS with evidence of antidepressant effects include repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial electric stimulation (TES) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Objectives: This systematic review aims to summarize evidence on NIBS efficacy, safety and acceptability in treating peripartum depression (PPD). Methods: We included randomized, non-randomized and case reports, that used NIBS during pregnancy and the postpartum. The reduction of depressive symptoms and neonatal safety were the primary and co-primary outcomes, respectively. Results: rTMS shows promising results for the treatment of PPD, with clinically significant decreases in depressive symptoms between baseline and end of treatment and overall good acceptability. Although the safety profile for rTMS is adequate in the postpartum, caution is warranted during pregnancy. In TES, evidence on efficacy derives mostly from single-arm studies, compromising the encouraging findings. Further investigation is necessary concerning ECT, as clinical practice relies on clinical experience and is only described in low-quality case-reports. Limitations: The reduced number of controlled studies, the lack of complete datasets and the serious/high risk of bias of the reports warrant cautious interpretations. Conclusions and implications: Existing evidence is limited across NIBS techniques; comparative studies are lacking, and standard stimulation parameters are yet to be established. Although rTMS benefits from the most robust research, future multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the position of each NIBS strategy within the pathways of care.
dc.description.firstpage443
dc.description.lastpage460
dc.description.volume140
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.06.005
dc.identifier.issn1879-1379
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/34616
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Psychiatric Research
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subject.otherlanguageDepression
dc.subject.otherlanguageNon-invasive brain stimulation
dc.subject.otherlanguagePerinatal
dc.subject.otherlanguagePeripartum
dc.subject.otherlanguageSystematic review
dc.titleEfficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation in decreasing depression symptoms during the peripartum period: A systematic review
dc.typeArtigo de revisão
local.scopus.citations16
local.scopus.eid2-s2.0-85108091063
local.scopus.subjectBrain
local.scopus.subjectDepression
local.scopus.subjectElectroconvulsive Therapy
local.scopus.subjectFemale
local.scopus.subjectHumans
local.scopus.subjectInfant, Newborn
local.scopus.subjectMulticenter Studies as Topic
local.scopus.subjectPeripartum Period
local.scopus.subjectPregnancy
local.scopus.subjectTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation
local.scopus.subjectTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation
local.scopus.updated2024-12-01
local.scopus.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85108091063&origin=inward
Arquivos