In/on applied legal research: Pragmatic limits to the impact of peripheral international legal scholarship via policy papers
Tipo
Artigo
Data de publicação
2021
Periódico
Leiden Journal of International Law
Citações (Scopus)
2
Autores
Giannattasio A.R.C.
Drezza D.R.
Wehby M.B.
Drezza D.R.
Wehby M.B.
Orientador
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Membros da banca
Programa
Resumo
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.This article examines the limits that academics from peripheral countries might encounter while trying to influence the decision-making process inside an international organization. Although there are different mechanisms whereby academia might influence non-academic debates, we highlight here the use of policy papers, in order to examine and discuss the non-textual barriers which might be faced by those academics. After an analysis of primary sources this article presents some pragmatic limits in the use of policy papers and discusses the consequences of this condition for the legitimation of international organizations. As such, relevant international organizations still seem to be unresponsive to some initiatives in particular: Closed to the spontaneous participation of academia; and not willing to call for contributions from academic communities. This is particularly relevant for contributions from peripheral academia and other non-state actors, who lack the capability to disturb the traditional ideational power exercised by core (Western) countries and by state-centric ideology in current international law.