Resilience Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorPinto T.M.
dc.contributor.authorLaurence P.G.
dc.contributor.authorMacedo C.R.
dc.contributor.authorMacedo E.C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T19:18:36Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T19:18:36Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2021 Pinto, Laurence, Macedo and Macedo.Resilience may be defined as the ability to recover and adapt to adverse situations. Given that resilience involves cognitive and behavioral aspects, it could be promoted based on strategies that favor them, especially during childhood and adolescence. As a result, several resilience-focused programs have been developed and studied. This systematic review of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) aimed to assess resilience-focused programs for children (<12 years old) and adolescents (12–22 years old) compared to active (treatment as usual, other program modalities, and educational curriculum at school) or inactive (waiting list, no treatment) control groups. We performed a systematic review of meta-analyses of RCTs. The following databases were searched: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO. Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the studies’ risk of bias. Meta-analyses of random effects were conducted to calculate the standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of program effectiveness. Of the 17 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, 13 provided sufficient data to assess the effectiveness of the programs after their implementation. Meta-analyses indicated overall effectiveness of the programs in promoting resilience (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI [0.15, 0.81], p = 0.0077). The subgroup analysis indicated effectiveness only among adolescents’ resilience (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI [0.08, 0.88], p = 0.02). The follow-up analysis also indicated evidence of continuation of results within a period of up to 6 months up (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI [−0.44, 0.69], p = 0.02). These results indicated the effectiveness of promoting resilience, especially in adolescents, and its continuation in follow-up analyses. These findings are promising in the field of resilience programs; however, further studies are necessary to analyze the different possible characteristics of programs and their results. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020179874], [CRD42020179874].
dc.description.volume12
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754115
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/34559
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychology
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subject.otherlanguageadolescents
dc.subject.otherlanguagechildren
dc.subject.otherlanguageprogram
dc.subject.otherlanguageresilience
dc.subject.otherlanguagesystematic review
dc.titleResilience Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
dc.typeArtigo de revisão
local.scopus.citations21
local.scopus.eid2-s2.0-85120696182
local.scopus.updated2024-12-01
local.scopus.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120696182&origin=inward
Arquivos
Coleções
Artigos de periódico