The impact of cash transfers on mental health in children and young people in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorZimmerman A.
dc.contributor.authorGarman E.
dc.contributor.authorAvendano-Pabon M.
dc.contributor.authorAraya R.
dc.contributor.authorEvans-Lacko S.
dc.contributor.authorMcDaid D.
dc.contributor.authorPark A.-L.
dc.contributor.authorHessel P.
dc.contributor.authorDiaz Y.
dc.contributor.authorMatijasevich A.
dc.contributor.authorZiebold C.
dc.contributor.authorBauer A.
dc.contributor.authorPaula C.S.
dc.contributor.authorLund C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T19:20:46Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T19:20:46Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstract© Introduction Although cash transfer programmes are not explicitly designed to improve mental health, by reducing poverty and improving the life chances of children and young people, they may also improve their mental health. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the evidence on the effectiveness of cash transfers to improve the mental health of children and young people in low-income and middle-income countries. Methods We searched Pubmed, EBSCOhost, Scientific Electronic Library Online, ISI Web of Science and Social Sciences Citation Index and grey literature (from January 2000 to July 2020) for studies which quantitatively assessed the impact of cash transfers on mental health in young people (aged 0-24 years), using a design that incorporated a control group. We extracted Cohen's d effects size and used a random-effects model for the meta-analysis on studies that measured depressive symptoms, I 2 statistic and assessment of study quality. Results We identified 12 116 articles for screening, of which 12 were included in the systematic review (covering 13 interventions) and seven in the meta-analysis assessing impact on depressive symptoms specifically. There was high heterogeneity (I 2 =95.2) and a high risk of bias (0.38, 95% CIs:-5.08 to 5.85; p=0.86) across studies. Eleven interventions (85%) showed a significant positive impact of cash transfers on at least one mental health outcome in children and young people. However, no study found a positive effect on all mental health outcomes examined, and the meta-analysis showed no impact of cash transfers on depressive symptoms (0.02, 95% CIs:-0.19 to 0.23; p=0.85). Conclusion Cash transfers may have positive effects on some mental health outcomes for young people, with no negative effects identified. However, there is high heterogeneity across studies, with some interventions showing no effects. Our review highlights how the effect of cash transfers may vary by social and economic context, culture, design, conditionality and mental health outcome.
dc.description.issuenumber4
dc.description.volume6
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004661
dc.identifier.issn2059-7908
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/34674
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Global Health
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subject.otherlanguagechild health
dc.subject.otherlanguagehealth economics
dc.subject.otherlanguagehealth policy
dc.subject.otherlanguagemental health & psychiatry
dc.subject.otherlanguagesystematic review
dc.titleThe impact of cash transfers on mental health in children and young people in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeArtigo de revisão
local.scopus.citations48
local.scopus.eid2-s2.0-85105230204
local.scopus.updated2024-06-01
local.scopus.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105230204&origin=inward
Arquivos