Low impact recreational use and biodiversity protection

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authordos Santos M.D.
dc.contributor.authorBlackwell B.D.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T23:48:30Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T23:48:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstract© 2020 selection and editorial matter, Paul Martin, Márcia Dieguez Leuzinger, Solange Teles da Silva, and Gabriel Leuzinger Coutinho. All rights reserved.This chapter outlines the role that surfing reserves play in biodiver-sity conservation in Australia and Brazil. Surfing reserves demonstrate the possibility of untapped opportunities to use recreation (and possibly other cultural values) to secure biodiversity conservation in situations where purely environmental concerns are insufficient to obtain and fund protection. Both countries are megadiverse and surfing reserves are an important innovative opportunity to meet biodiversity targets while helping protect social and cultural capital, and to deliver economic ben-efits. These two countries provide contrasting examples of how surfing reserves have been implemented in conjunction with broader biodi-versity measures, and the effectiveness of the various surfing reserve regimes. These cases identify a new International Union for Conser-vation of Nature category, 'low-impact passive recreation (surfing_ reserve)', that has the potential to deliver positive biodiversity outcomes.
dc.description.firstpage105
dc.description.lastpage124
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/35009
dc.relation.ispartofAchieving Biodiversity Protection in Megadiverse Countries: A Comparative Assessment of Australia and Brazil
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.titleLow impact recreational use and biodiversity protection
dc.typeCapítulo de livro
local.scopus.citations0
local.scopus.eid2-s2.0-85107165528
local.scopus.updated2024-05-01
local.scopus.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107165528&origin=inward
Arquivos
Coleções
Livro e Capítulo de livro