Transcranial DC stimulation coupled with TENS for the treatment of chronic pain: A preliminary study
dc.contributor.author | Boggio P.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Amancio E.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Correa C.F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cecilio S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Valasek C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bajwa Z. | |
dc.contributor.author | Freedman S.D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pascual-Leone A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Edwards D.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fregni F. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-13T01:36:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-13T01:36:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Based on evidence showing that electrical stimulation of the nervous system is an effective method to decrease chronic neurogenic pain, we aimed to investigate whether the combination of 2 methods of electrical stimulation-a method of peripheral stimulation [transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)] and a method of noninvasive brain stimulation [transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)]-induces greater pain reduction as compared with tDCS alone and sham stimulation. Methods: We performed a preliminary, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover, clinical study in which 8 patients were randomized to receive active tDCS/active TENS ("tDCS/TENS" group), active tDCS/sham TENS ("tDCS" group), and sham tDCS/sham TENS ("sham" group) stimulation. Assessments were performed immediately before and after each condition by a blinded rater. Results: The results showed that there was a significant difference in pain reduction across the conditions of stimulation (P=0.006). Post hoc tests showed significant pain reduction as compared with baseline after the tDCS/TENS condition [reduction by 36.5% (±10.7), P=0.004] and the tDCS condition [reduction by 15.5% (±4.9), P=0.014], but not after sham stimulation (P=0.35). In addition, tDCS/TENS induced greater pain reduction than tDCS (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study suggest that the combination of TENS with tDCS has a superior effect compared with tDCS alone. © 2009 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. | |
dc.description.firstpage | 691 | |
dc.description.issuenumber | 8 | |
dc.description.lastpage | 695 | |
dc.description.volume | 25 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181af1414 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1536-5409 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/37437 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Journal of Pain | |
dc.rights | Acesso Restrito | |
dc.subject.otherlanguage | Brain polarization | |
dc.subject.otherlanguage | Brain stimulation | |
dc.subject.otherlanguage | Central pain | |
dc.subject.otherlanguage | Chronic pain | |
dc.subject.otherlanguage | Transcranial direct current stimulation | |
dc.subject.otherlanguage | Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation | |
dc.title | Transcranial DC stimulation coupled with TENS for the treatment of chronic pain: A preliminary study | |
dc.type | Artigo | |
local.scopus.citations | 93 | |
local.scopus.eid | 2-s2.0-70349682127 | |
local.scopus.updated | 2024-05-01 | |
local.scopus.url | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=70349682127&origin=inward |