Modelos de classificação de risco de crédito para financiamentos imobiliários: regressão logística, análise discriminante, árvores de decisão, bagging e boosting

Abstract

This study applied the techniques of traditional parametric discriminant analysis and logistic regression analysis of credit real estate financing transactions where borrowers may or may not have a payroll loan transaction. It was the hit rate compared these methods with the non-parametric techniques based on classification trees, and the methods of meta-learning bagging and boosting that combine classifiers for improved accuracy in the algorithms.In a context of high housing deficit, especially in Brazil, the financing of real estate can still be very encouraged. The impacts of sustainable growth in the mortgage not only bring economic benefits and social. The house is, for most individuals, the largest source of expenditure and the most valuable asset that will have during her lifetime.At the end of the study concluded that the computational techniques of decision trees are more effective for the prediction of payers (94.2% correct), followed by bagging (80.7%) and boosting (or arcing , 75.2%). For the prediction of bad debtors in mortgages, the techniques of logistic regression and discriminant analysis showed the worst results (74.6% and 70.7%, respectively). For the good payers, the decision tree also showed the best predictive power (75.8%), followed by discriminant analysis (75.3%) and boosting (72.9%). For the good paying mortgages, bagging and logistic regression showed the worst results (72.1% and 71.7%, respectively). Logistic regression shows that for a borrower with payroll loans, the chance to be a bad credit is 2.19 higher than if the borrower does not have such type of loan.The presence of credit between the payroll operations of mortgage borrowers also has relevance in the discriminant analysis.